Storage area network (SAN) to meet a customers needs, one of the most important choices is to determine the type of connectivity to use; Fibre Channel (FRC) or iSCSI. Each has advantages and disadvantages and each make sense in different solutions.Fibre Channel was by far the most popular way to connect SAN, both because it has been proven as a reliable, resilient and scalable method, and because iSCSI was relatively unknown in terms of performance, reliability and scalability.Fibre Channel protocol tends to be the best for bandwidth intensive applications. However many believe that most applications and storage architecture can not take advantage of all the bandwidth that Fibre Channel delivers today.
The cost of implementing a Fibre Channel SAN can cause companies look at iSCSI as an alternative solution. In some cases, the Fibre Channel SAN makes sense imply because the customer already has FC implemented within their environment and the "learning curve" is often very small.Over the past few years the iSCSI protocol has come into its own, proving to be a good alternative for connecting an organization servers to network storage, especially in smaller distributed environments like branch offices or remote locations. iSCSI translates into simpler storage management and consolidation at a reasonable cost.
The cost of implementing a Fibre Channel SAN can cause companies look at iSCSI as an alternative solution. In some cases, the Fibre Channel SAN makes sense imply because the customer already has FC implemented within their environment and the "learning curve" is often very small.Over the past few years the iSCSI protocol has come into its own, proving to be a good alternative for connecting an organization servers to network storage, especially in smaller distributed environments like branch offices or remote locations. iSCSI translates into simpler storage management and consolidation at a reasonable cost.
No comments:
Post a Comment